Performance Data
2017 Performance - Attainment:
KS2
Reading 74% expected, 33% more than expected (National : 71% expected, 25% more than expected)
Writing 81% expected, 30% more than expected (National : 76% expected, 18% more than expected)
Maths 78% expected, 30% more than expected (National : 75% expected, 23% more than expected)
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling (GPS) 78% expected, 41% more than expected (National : 77% expected, 31% more than expected)
Combined reading / writing / maths score 63% expected, 19% more than expected (National : 61% expected, 9% more than expected)
Average scaled scores:-
Reading- School:105 (National:104)
GPS- School:106 (National:106)
Maths- School:106 (National:104)
KS1
Reading 70% expected, 22% more than expected
Writing 78% expected, 4% more than expected
Maths 78% expected, 22% more than expected
Combined reading / writing / maths score 63% expected, 4% more than expected
Year 1 Phonics
83% pass rate
Early Years good level of development (GLD)
67%
2017 Performance - Progress:
KS2
Reading 1.6 (-0.8 - 4.0)
Writing 3.1 (0.7 - 5.5)
Maths 1.0 (-1.2 - 3.2)
2016 Performance - Attainment:
KS2
Reading 67.9% expected, 25% more than expected
Writing 89.3% expected, 28.6% more than expected
Maths 60.7% expected, 21.4% more than expected
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling (GPS) 85.7% expected, 25% more than expected
Combined reading / writing / maths score 53.6% expected, 14.3% more than expected
Average scaled scores:-
Reading- 104.2
GPS- 105.8
Maths- 102.6
KS1
Reading 89.7% expected, 24.1% more than expected
Writing 72.4% expected, 17.2% more than expected
Maths 79.3% expected, 27.6% more than expected
Combined reading / writing / maths score 58.6% expected, 17.2% more than expected
Year 1 Phonics
80% pass rate
Early Years good level of development (GLD)
78.6%
2016 Performance - Progress:
KS2
Reading 3.2
Writing 4.73
Maths 0.79
Progress has been calculated differently this year with a positive number being extremely good. It shows the progress made from the end of KS1 to the end of KS2.
All Isleham scores were far above the floor target set.